Sunday, March 18, 2012

Men's Sexual Nature


No, I am not an expert on this because I am not a man but I am married to one, I have two sons, and a father. I have read books about it, Ken and I talk openly about it, and Dennis Prager talks about it a lot on his male/female hour. He admitted that a man's sexual nature is a heavy burden for men that want to live good lives.

This is difficult for young women to hear. They want their husbands to only be attracted to them. Lindsay Harold described it perfectly: "It's kind of like you can see a really awesome looking dessert in the menu at a restaurant, but you're too full or it's too much money to get it, so you go home and eat dessert there later because looking at that menu made you hungry for something sweet. 

When men see a woman's beauty, in makes them hungry for sex. Not necessarily hungry for sex with her, just for sex in general. It reminds them of the beauty and satisfaction of marital intimacy. That's normal and there's nothing wrong with that.

The proper context for sex is between a husband and wife. So when a good man gets hungry for sex from seeing women out there in the world or just from thinking about sex, he comes to his wife to fulfill his desire in the proper context where it is pleasing to God, and also where it builds and strengthens his relationship with his wife. Every time he engages in marital intimacy with his wife, it strengthens his desire to be with her and not any other woman because she is the one who fulfills that desire for him. The desire for sex can crop up at any time for any number of reasons, but his wife is the one he desires to fulfill it with."

Understanding a man's sexual nature is important to understanding your man. Dennis Prager always says that if you married a man who is faithful to you, give him a lot of hugs, kisses, and thank him. It is most men's nature to want to have sex with a lot of different women. If they are godly men, however, or even men of integrity, they know that is not what they are suppose to do.

I have many friends who are upset because their man will glance at a beautiful woman walk by, not lust but glance. That is in their nature to do that. Dennis was saying that just because a man may get somewhat excited by a beautiful woman for ten seconds, he forgets about her ten seconds later. He married his wife, because he loves her and wants to be with her.

So just because your husband likes a lot of sex with you and enjoys glancing at beautiful women, doesn't make him a sex pervert. God created him to be attracted to women.  That doesn't mean he doesn't have to battle his sexual nature, learn to control it and not allow it to control him, but if we are married, we need to understand this battle and be sympathetic with them and not condemning.

We have our own battles. Most women battle their emotions. We must learn to control our emotions and not let them control us. Many of us battle with wanting to control and change our husbands. Don't allow this to happen.

So love on the husband the good Lord gave you. Satisfy his sexual need so he doesn't need to go roaming elsewhere. Let him be open with you about his sexual nature. It will cause him to feel closer to you when he feels you really know him and understand him. In this way, you can help him in this battle to be holy.

Finally, be all of one mind, having compassion one with another,
 love as brethren, be tender hearted, be courteous. 
I Peter 3:8

Comments (23)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I never thought of it that way :) Thanks!
Consider+This's avatar

Consider+This · 679 weeks ago

I would love to politely add my own opinion here. I wholly believe that it is society's influence that causes a man to 'naturally' want to be sexually involved with several women. I do not believe that God created him to be so promiscuous. The many diverse methods of satan's influence on the media in the United States is fully to blame. We (men and women alike) are taught through the culture that is ok to look but not touch, or if it feels good do it, or that we all have primal instincts in regards to sex. That sex is purely a need that must be met--like breathing. God created intercourse as an extremely intimate act between one man and one woman who have already been brought together in a very special covenant with God, knowing one another emotionally & lastly sexually. Sex in no means is something to be taken lightly, simply align our own beliefs and understandings to God's word, and His word ALONE!!!
3 replies · active 573 weeks ago
Perfectly said Consider+This.
Generally, if a man is gaining sexual fulfillment from his wife he is much more unlikely to struggle with his sexual nature as the his needs are satisfied. Unfortunately, we men live in this society where marketing and the way women dress provides a daily challenge to those of us who want to match our sexual behavior to God's ideals. "We live in this world but are not part of this world."

So God did not create man to be promiscuous, just a he did not create create some women to go after married men, but they do. A man runs up to 6-30 times more testosterone running through his veins at any given moment and a woman. His struggle with fulfilling his hormonal rush is much bigger than what most women will ever experience, and hence Lori's post on the subject. Understanding your man's perceived needs is a step towards helping him to think correctly about it and deal correctly with his sexual nature.

I will also add that a man's previous sexual sins prior to marriage or within the marriage greatly impact his ability to handle his sexual nature. Sin once it gets its hook into a man or women makes the struggle unnatural. Thank God He promises to give us all the power we need to both conquer sin and deal with our nature, both men and women.
I don't know about the US, but here in Australia a man just needs to walk into a news agency to see half naked ladies on covers of magazines (in fact they are in full view of anyone including children). And I'm not referring to the really bad magazines, these ones are considered mild. Or he can turn on the TV and see women newsreaders wearing tight outfits or any sitcom will have women not wearing very much.

No matter where he turns, there is plenty of women to look at - most when he might not even want to.
Thank you for this comment. It's society's conditioning and belief that sex is one of our greatest needs that contributes to this.
Thank you, Lori, for sharing your wisdom.

I agree with you about protecting men from temptation by dressing modestly. My husband has often asked me to change my outfit because it's too tight or otherwise draws attention to my body. From my perspective, it's just been cute or fashionable -- because I don't think like a man! But so much of what women wear, even sometimes godly women, is not modest.

Men are more visually stimulated than women. We need to treat them as the weaker brother in this area and limit our own "freedom" to wear whatever we want for their good. It also honors our husbands and our marriages for us to keep our bodies for our husbands alone!
Lori, thank you for posting the link to the bathing suit website! Stupid me I never even searched online. My husband and I decided a couple of years ago that my bathing suit wasn't really appropriate for the public (it was a bikini, I've only been living for the Lord for a couple of years and in the beginning I had no knowledge or understanding at how inappropriate that attire was since it was so culturally acceptable). I felt frustrated never finding anything I liked in the store that was also modest and so we haven't been swimming in 2 years as a family. Great sight, already on the first page I see 3 or 4 I would feel good in and are much more modest than most anything else I've seen. Thanks again. :)
This is why people should show hijabi women some respect.
1 reply · active 675 weeks ago
yes, as GentlyLed said

"We need to treat them as the weaker brother in this area and limit our own "freedom" to wear whatever we want for their good. It also honors our husbands and our marriages for us to keep our bodies for our husbands alone! "

it's not oppression of women; it's protection of men!
If a husband is getting all his needs (physical, emotional & spiritual) met by his wife, he will not look or even be attracted to other women. That is why God said, he will leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife.
If a husband needs are being met be his wife, he will be blind to the temptations that are thrown his way.

Why do I say this, because being married for nearly 21 years I can say two things.
One is I know for a 100% that our Father knows everything and has my best interest at heart. And second the best times I was immune for female temptations was when my wife was fulfilling my needs. She, my wife, was only one I lusted after the whole day, my thoughts were on her the whole time. Other women didn't have any affect on me, because I was so connected to my wife that I was in a way blind to see what other women have (sex) to offer.

So I will trust my Father and His Word (the Bible) to keep me safe.
I find it silly that some commenters feel that men will not even LOOK at another woman if he is fulfilled at home. Jesus wouldn't have spoken so directly about lust if it weren't a problem. One of our pastors said it best (in my opinion) when he said, "The first look is a freebie - because you look at people normally when encountering them. The second look is the problem."
1 reply · active 679 weeks ago
I agree! And you'll be fooling yourself if you think by just keeping him happy will keep him from "wondering". They are MANY many men who get fulfilled and still have issues w/lust and pornography. Not to mention sex addicts. (and there are Christian sex addicts)
It's not just men that "look" at women. Many women I know, myself included, appreciate a good looking man. Yeah, if a good looking guy walks by, I may give a second glance. Does that mean I don't love my husband? NO. Does it mean I'm tempted to have sex with that good looking guy? NO! Does it mean I'm not fulfilled by my husband? NO! It's human nature for BOTH men and women to look at the oppisite sex. A lot of women are very sexual, but for years have repressed their sexual nature, because "good girls", were not supposed to be sexual.
2 replies · active 557 weeks ago
I agree that to appreciate an attractive person is not a problem - for the most part. But I don't agree that you can lump men and women into the same category. I'm not saying this to allow me to look and not my husband (although that would be convenient...lol). Men are affected by the physical differently than women. Men can more easily make that leap from looking to lusting than women can. So I think it can be a problem for anyone, but I think it's a more slippery slope for men.
Since divorcing at age 50, and now having a boyfriend who is very open with his own sexuality, I have given myself permission to more so look and appreciate men. In my previous marriage, I felt guilty and as if this was essentially a sin. Thus so, I simply did not allow myself to 'go there.' I still somewhat wrestle with this because I would not like it if my boyfriend was looking at other women the same way I was looking at other men, but as there is nothing I can do to stop that, I have more of a "if you can't beat them, join them," attitude on this particular subject. I'm told I'm a good-looking woman who looks younger than her years, and I attend a gym where there are a lot of appealing and fit men. They look at me, and I look at them. It causes a certain high with me, and makes me appreciate the mail form all the more. Having good-looking fit men around also improves my work out! I am very tired of hearing men insist only they are visually wired. I suspect women simply do not give himself permission to look, enjoy, and appreciate, most likely because then their character is questioned. God gave us eyes to see. Appreciating the beauty of the mail form which God created is not bad. It is lusting and or allowing it to drift into something unhealthy or sinful that is wrong.
If I may make yet another suggestion: I usually order my bathing suit from LL Bean in the US. They are now doing free shipping, and I find their quality hard to beat.
This subject has morphed into a fascinating discussion: If women are less visually stimulated then men, does that mean that women have the freedom to look at men more physically because there is supposedly less temptation for them? And, if men are less emotionally stimulated then women does that mean that men have the freedom to not have to guard their emotions as much because there is supposedly less temptation for them? Or do we as men and women, have an imperative as blood-bought believers to guard our eyes and our hearts equally as a fruit of our righteousness in Christ?
2 replies · active 679 weeks ago
I think we should all guard our hearts and minds (and bodies). But I do think we should know our weaknesses and be especially conscious not to feed those.
Totally in agreement. We also need to be aware that our enemy is adept at striking in areas that we think that we are naturally stronger in: Hence, a woman could easily fall to visual sexual temptation because she thinks that she is more immune by virtue of her gender. And a man could easily stumble by emotionally lusting after someone because he thinks that men are not easily swayed by their feelings. Pride goes before a fall but when we are weak, then we are strong.
This is such a need for women to grasp. We may never fully "get it" but we must try to comprehend and respond in a way that reflects our love for our husbands--the way God created them. Thanks, Lori, for bringing this subject to the forefront!
Very well stated. I've been married 12 years {almost} and the differences between a man and a woman still amaze me. I do a lot of reading to help better understand these differences and create a sense of love and respect in our marriage. I think our culture has made of mockery of men in our society and has reduced them to cave men, but they are just different from women, and that is a good thing.
I hate that our society tells women that we are responsible for our own actions. If we're rude or short with hubby, we have no excuse, even if he's rude to us. But, with this particular issue, we're always quick to judge and blame, and release men of all guilt--if he were satisfied at home he wouldn't cheat. That is NOT Biblical! We are all responsible for and accountable for our own actions. It's really sad when a wife's sins are her own fault, no matter how her husband treats her, but if a husband sins, it must be the wife's fault. That's a bunch of garbage.

Yes, I believe that we as women are called to serve our husbands in this way--because that's the way God created marriage, not because it's then "our fault" if our husbands cheat on us.

Also, I believe that we should work hard to dress modestly and not be a stumbling block to someone else. But we can't completely blame the woman like men are these weak creatures with no self-control who don't know any better, when at the same time we're saying men should be leaders in the home, uplifted and respected.

A man worthy of respect wouldn't blame a woman for his failures.
You get a standing ovation from me for this article, Lori !

Post a new comment

Comments by