Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Why Do Men Tend To Be More Skeptical?


Cassi was very excited one morning.  She was at her cousin Ali's home one night.  Ali and her mom, Alisa, my sister, took a very extensive health course and learned so much.  They learned that your pulse will rise by five or more points if you eat something your body is allergic to. 

Your body will release histamines in response to the allergen and cause your pulse to rise.  You take your pulse.  Then you take a mouthful of the food you want to test.  Take your pulse and if it goes up five or more points you are allergic it. 

Stay off it for awhile allowing your gut to heal and then test it again.  So Cassi was trying all these different foods to see if she had any allergic reactions to any of them. Ken came down and asked what was going on.  He laughed. 

Cassi said, "You are always so skeptical."  I told her it is in a man's nature to be skeptical.  Most cults have been started by women.  Fortune tellers, palm readers, astrologists, etc. are mostly all women. 

The Bible even said that the woman is more easily deceived than the man. Shortly afterwards, Steven came into the room and asked what was going on.  He laughed also and I told him he had the typical male reaction.  This is a good thing. 

Men should be more skeptical.  We women fall for things a little too easily.  This method of figuring out if you are allergic to something may very well be a good thing but I thought it proved the Bible's point so well.  Cassi and I were immediately gun-ho on it and Ken and Steven were not.  They wanted a bit more proof before they believed it. 

This is why God wants men to be in charge of marriages and churches.  He is God.  He made us and knows us better than we know ourselves.  We can trust Him.

Adam was not deceived but the woman 
being deceived was in transgression.
I Timothy 2:14


Comments (18)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Friendly food for thought: The resurrected Christ appeared first to women, who the scriptures seemed to portray as believing in Him right away. As a contrast to the women, the disciples took longer to believe in His resurrection. The way the story is told in the New Testament, without the women the men would not have believed! :)
1 reply · active 606 weeks ago
Great point, Aimee. I think that is why more women go to church than men. We believe things much more readily than men.
I wanted to add that the women were very familiar with Jesus prior to his death just as the men were. An interesting difference in responses between the two genders in light of this post.
I don't think being skeptical is a man/woman trait, but more of a personal trait. Some women are more skeptical than some men. I think that I am more skeptical than my husband, for instance. Also, the cults that I can think of were started by men. Very few cults started by women come to my mind. If you do a search about cult leaders you will find most are men, not women. Whether more men or women follow cults would be different insight.
Karen,

"It is one of the strange historical particularities of the saga of cultism that some cults were either started by women or were influences in a major way by the allegedly weaker sex: Christian Science, Mary Bakker Eddy; the Unity School of Christianity, Myrtle Fillmore; Spiritism, the Fox sisters; Jehovah's Witness, Marie Russel; Theosophy, Helena Blavatsky and Annie Besant; the Peace Mission Movement (Father Divine), Sister Penny and Faithful Mary (Viola Wilson)" The Kingdom Of The Cults by Walter Martin

"It can be clearly seen from the study of non-Christian cults, ancient and modern, that the female teaching ministry has graphically fulfilled what Paul anticipated in his day by divine revelation, and brought in its wake, as history tells us, confusion, division, and strife. This is true from Johanna Southcutt to Mary Baker Eddy to Helena Blavatsky and the Fox sisters, all of whom were living proof of the validity of our Lord's declaration that "if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch" (Matthew 15:14b)" from pg. 286 in the book quoted above
I didn't know that so many cults were started by women. That is really interesting!

The bible tells us that women are more easily deceived than men. Why else would Satan go directly to Eve instead of to Adam who was the leader?
I know a great many skeptical women (as well as plenty of more trusting women too).

Have you ever considered that trust/gullibility it might be a trait shown more often by women who are within your highly conservative faith based social circles? If a man is savvy and a woman is gullible, it seems to me that teachings on the subordination of women might be more readily accepted than if a woman were more skeptical and prone to check things out for herself in the Bible, looking into different points of view.

Most likely that most of the skeptical, savvy, Biblically capable women have already been skeptical about female subordination, and so, you wouldn't really tend to encounter many of them among your like-minded female friends... which would explain why you seem to type-cast a certain kind of woman as a 'typical' woman... she probably is 'typical' in your experience, but I don't think your observations really transfer to what is typical of the entire gender at large.

Also, the Bible only tells us that one woman was deceived (she was). Any inferences you draw from that about what 'all women' are like are not "what the Bible says" -- they are "what the Bible got me thinking about". The difference is very important.

(PS -- I also don't see how *starting* a cult or scam is the act of someone who is gullible or trusting. It points to quite a lot of intelligence and willingness to take advantage of others who are gullible. Surely an 'easily trusting' woman wouldn't be so innovative or callous?)
4 replies · active 606 weeks ago
I wonder too if education has anything to with it. It would stand to reason that a woman with more education would be more skeptical and less trusting than one who may not be as educated. At least in my field critical thinking is a must have. If one is never taught to think critically ( as I've found many of the extremely conservative religious groups are not (especially the women)), then one is more likely to be drawn into ideas more easily. It's really only in the past century that the education of women has become a priority. Previously they were left uneducated - especially in Biblical times when women were viewed more as property than human beings.
I think you hit the nail on the head, Emily! I'm degreed twice over and I know a lot of women as degreed or more so than myself thanks to connections to my undergrad and grad schools. Of the women I'm close to from school and professional organizations, each one is much more skeptical and usually give their husbands a run for their money in the skepticism department. The women in my church who are not as educated are much, much more trusting.
Welcome back PJB,

There are millions of strong, highly educated Christian women who desire to be in a submissive relationship with their husbands because it fulfills many of their emotional and psychological needs, For those of us who believe the Bible we see God's design in creating a husband's covering and protection for us.

Any women starting a cult was self deceived. Intelligence and the study of the whole word of God was most likely put aside for their sense and feelings. Would you disagree that men are often more fact based and women feeling based? Or are your women circles filled with a new type of female who acts and looks more and more like a man every day?

Few can doubt that women are much more trusting than men. Perhaps the reason for this is pointed out by Susan below in Testosterone and Ocytocin, the way God made us.
Yes, I know that there are many strong, highly educated Christian women who enjoy a subordinate relationship in their marriage -- I didn't say they weren't strong, educated or Christian. I simply responded to *your* observation that *you* find many of those women gullible and/or over-trusting and/or not terribly skeptical. I was only musing that perhaps your sample of observation is self-selecting.

Of a larger sample, I find plenty of female skeptics. *I* doubt that women are more trusting than men. Perhaps that's because doubting assertions like that is part of being skeptical... which is something that I am.

I'm also not at all sure that women start cults / become fortune tellers / etc because they believe in it. I think most people (both genders) who start cults are in it for the money or the power. I think most fortune tellers know full well that they are deceiving their customers.

I don't know how someone would research your idea that "men are often more fact based and women feeling based" -- but since the Bible doesn't say either way, and no research has substantiated it, and my personal observations go no further than that I know "plenty" of men who are both ways, and "plenty" of women who are both ways -- I really don't consider myself qualified to go beyond that point.

I don't know any women who "act like men" -- none at all. All the women I know act like women... because they are women, so if they act like that, it's obviously 'one' way that women act. Women are wondrous creatures full of variety.

(Note in the study: the group of women included women who were found to both 'low trust' and 'high trust' individuals... so, clearly, women in general come in both varieties. All that was found was that a high-trust state and/or person could be manipulated by additional T. -- I wonder if gullibility is a symptom of low T production in some women? Doesn't low T in women also correlate with low sex drive? More research required. Science is complicated,eh?)
I am very logical and analytical person so tends not be gullible with these sorts of things. I tend to ask the “why” questions —think before diving into something, I also tend to do my research. I come from a family of women who are similar and think with our heads. This can frustrate men as they are not always expecting a woman to think the same as they do.
Study: Testosterone makes socially naive women more wary

By Elizabeth Weise, USA TODAY

Testosterone makes trusting women less trusting and more socially wary, says a study done by psychologists at Utrecht University in the Netherlands and the University of Cape Town in South Africa.
The researchers gave 24 women 0.5 milligrams of testosterone under their tongues and later a placebo, then asked them to grade the trustworthiness of people based on photos of their faces. The women who got the testosterone were much more likely to be less trustworthy of the strangers' faces.
The research is in this week's edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
To control for individual differences, they determined the women's basic trust levels from their choices when they'd been given a placebo, then divided the group into two -- one that was more trusting and one that was less. The trust levels of the naturally low-trusting didn't move much when they were given testosterone, but when naturally high-trusting women were, their trust levels decreased markedly.
Testosterone is a sex hormone present in both sexes, but in higher levels in men. Higher levels of testosterone have been shown to be associated with competition for resources and even financial gains on the stock market.
The researchers notes that previous research has shown that ocytocin (ox-y toe sin), a hormone associated with love, increases interpersonal trust. Their goal was to look at testosterone and see if it was an 'anti-ocytocin.' It's already well established that testosterone is associated with dominance and success in the competition for resources.
They conclude that testosterone plays an important role in increasing social vigilance among trusting humans.
By Elizabeth Weise
http://content.usatoday.com/communit...en-more-wa...
nosogoodgirl 's avatar

nosogoodgirl · 606 weeks ago

As kids we believe pretty much everything, I think your life experiences are what make you skeptical. When you look at children they believe in Father Chrustmas, Easter Bunny, Tooth fairy, fairies in general, monsters, and in my case "Thing" ( a kind of troll with a bobble head my dad got from New Guinea 50 yrs ago. That he would somehow make talk when I would walk past and "Thing" would ask if I had been good, I would c*#p myself and run screaming from the room, which dad thought was hilarious) as we grow we learn these things are not true, I think if you find out in a way that is upsetting to you it makes you more skeptical of what you are later told. My 14 yr old daughter and I talked about what faith means I told her that faith is the belief in something for which you have no proof or only what you have been told, she said she believes I god and Jesus even though we only have the bible to prove it. I told her that was her faith, and it was a personal thing and no one can tell her what to believe not even me. We where watching a show about Jesus walking on water and one of the disciples sinking due to lack of faith ( I haven't read the bible only certain parts but I talk to different people and know a few stories, my choice, but I will look up things if people tell me where they are and are trying to make me believe something, so I can read it myself to make up my own mind )
nosogoodgirl 's avatar

nosogoodgirl · 606 weeks ago

Also made me think of what is going on in my house ATM, we just moved in and a friend made us a dining table from wood that was from a shipwreck a couple of hundred years old, while I was sitting alone at home I thought I saw a girl run down the hall out of the corner of my eye, thinking I was either seeing things or going mad I said nothing, a week later my partner said" did you see that someone just ran past the loungroom, still I said nothing, until my daughter said why did you come into my room last night touch my shoulder and say ' they've gone now?' And then last week her boyfriend turned around from the sink, he was doing dishes for me, and screamed, then freaked out and asked who's that lady standing in the hall?" When I hear these stories from others I automatically don't believe them, but I'm starting to think that this may not be just my imagination, would love to know what others think, or have experienced.
1 reply · active 606 weeks ago
Interesting! :) I'll ask my husband what he thinks. He's seen things in the past, too. :)
For what it's worth, my husband sometimes calls me Cynical Cynthia. I'm the one who will be debunking rumors making the rounds on Facebook or email, while his nature is to trust that things are true and add "that's horrible - where can I protest?"

I just see it as a personality thing, which isn't inherently male or female.

I can see being trusting being linked to optimism. I can also see it being linked to being sociable - after all, you may keep others at more of a distance if you are always questioning. My husband is more outgoing than I am.

Post a new comment

Comments by