With the
tragic news of Joshua’s infidelities at the forefront of so much speculation, I
wanted to research what godly men and preachers teach about divorce since I
will never encourage anyone to get divorced. I believe the vows through good
times and bad times, sickness and health cover about everything that may strike
a marriage. Plus, marriages are an example of Christ and His church and He will
NEVER divorce His church. Here are some of the words John MacArthur had to say about divorce from a sermon in 1979.
Where you have self-centered, sinful, carnal people who cannot
sustain right relationships and where you have a society with toleration for
divorce, you're going to have divorce on a rampant, pandemic level and that's
what we have in our society.
And that's why when you come to Malachi 2:16 as we did in our
last study you hear God say, I hate divorce; I HATE divorce. I don't care for
what reason; divorce always violates the imagery God has designed for marriage,
as well as violating the marriage itself…I hate to think of the next generation
of emotionally imbalanced people. I hate to think of all of these little
children in broken homes that are going to grow up and no sense of security, no
concept of authority, no sense of morality, no standards to live by, etc. I
hate to think of the societal effects of divorce. But that's down the line for
me; what I really hate to think of is the fact that divorce and remarriage is a
violation in many cases of the Word of God and that's even a more important
issue to me.
Now, the Old Testament lays down a standard and it never changes.
Let me add this, divorce, now get this, divorce is NEVER God's way to resolve a
conflict, never. That's why God never commands divorce and God never really
condones divorce in the Bible. God knows it'll happen, and God tries to
regulate its consequences, but He never commands it because it's never the
solution.
God's design was no divorce; God prohibited divorce; God hated
divorce. However, God knew in a cursed world where sin existed and relationships
were strained because of the curse itself that divorce would be a reality and
so God simply permitted that when divorce happened there had to be certain
things followed to insure what would come about as a result. {He is speaking about
these verses from Matthew 5; "It
hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, {or divorce his wife} let
him give her a writing of divorcement; But I say unto you that whosoever shall
put away his wife, except for the cause of fornication, causes her to commit
adultery; and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth
adultery."}
God was trying to regulate the consequence of divorce. Nowhere
will you ever find on any page of the Bible God condoning or commanding
divorce. It never has a divine sanction; it’s just that God knows it exists,
and Jesus recognizes that it exists. It was basically a sociopolitical feature
to give a writing of divorcement to regulate the inevitable results. There
had to be some legal process because marriage was a legal contract, and so when
people were shedding their wives and men were becoming adulterous or women
becoming adulterous, when the innocent party was turned loose, they could make
no claim for anything; no one would know what the circumstances were. They
would not be able to explain their situation. And so to ease that and to
regulate future behavior, there was a writing of divorcement.
What was its purpose? It was a testimonial to the woman of her
freedom from the marital obligation to the husband who divorced her. In the
bill of divorcement was a statement that the woman was set free by the man so
that she wouldn't be accused of being a harlot, she wouldn't be accused of
having forsaken her home, or run off from her husband.
Let me summarize; listen, what have we learned so far? God made
man; God made woman to marry and be permanently one. God wanted an absolute
commitment of body and soul for life. God hates divorce; not some of it, all of
it. It is never His will, but He recognizes that it will be a part of human
society because of sin. In
certain cases God will allow divorce as a technicality in a case of adultery
only, but it is not necessary because a greater way to approach it would be to
love as Christ loves the church and as God loved Israel and as Hosea loved
Gomer. The scribes and the
Pharisees had perverted this absolute divine standard, and Jesus clarified it,
and in so doing pointed to them as sinners; for they had defiled and lowered
God's standard.
I must end this post with a wise comment from my Breathe Fire post written by
a woman whose husband was unfaithful to her.
If no one knew who Anna and Josh were they wouldn't have
to answer to anybody while they sought God. I have tried hard to live by the
standard of lifting my husband up at the City Gate which means I do not tell
others the ways my husband fails me. So I have had the luxury of standing by my
husband without the ridicule of others who think I am a fool. God wants to
redeem Josh, not condemn him! He is getting plenty of condemning. I have a
feeling Anna doesn't want to condemn him either. She just wants the husband and
marriage that God had planned for her. I have looked at my husband and enjoyed
seeing the work God has done in his life, even though his sin has hurt me and
hurt me badly. He is God's child and deserves to be redeemed and built up by
God to be the man He wants him to be.
I would hope that my husband would stand by me if I was sinning in
our marriage. Okay, who are we kidding? Of course, I sin in our marriage. Do I
do all my husband needs of me as his wife all the time? Nope! In fact, his pain
in my not fulfilling his needs probably matches mine when he has gone outside
our marriage to have those needs met. Sure, my husband has had choices. But so
do I! Who am I to throw the first stone? If Anna wants to stand by Josh and be
with him during this time {perhaps a long time} of becoming the man God wants
him to be, then good for her. Let her be. I will be praying for her strength
and devotion to her husband and God and that the scoffers are silenced.
Anna, along with all the women out there who have disobedient
husbands, there are a “cloud of witnesses” of women who have walked in your shoes yet stayed committed to their wayward husbands and many
have won them without a word. Stay strong, precious ones, and cling to your
faith and the Lover of your soul.
Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us, Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.
Hebrews 12:1, 2
Katie · 500 weeks ago
AngelaT111213 21p · 500 weeks ago
To piggy-back off off of the "If no one knew who Anna and Josh were" statement, would they be in the situation they are in right now? Or would he still struggle with what looks like a sex addiction(only my opinion)? Would Anna even know about it?
helen · 500 weeks ago
AMEN!!
thank you :)
Blessings to you
Helen UK
Jamie · 500 weeks ago
Charlie Wadd · 500 weeks ago
younggodlywomen 25p · 500 weeks ago
2happy4 66p · 500 weeks ago
I think we as a society are just so self-centered that we are unable to view any relationship as self-sacrificial anymore. Spouses indulge themselves with adultery and pornography and the other spouse is more concerned with their lives than helping the other spouse get back up and in the game. One gets caught in a self-gratifying trap and the other refuses to "waste their life" helping the first extricate themselves. It is all about "me".
Dennis Marks · 500 weeks ago
Biblical marriage is God's picture of salvation with God. We are espoused to God in this life and we must be faithful to the end. IF we are not faithful to the end, when the Marriage Supper of the Lamb happens, God will pronounce "I NEVER knew you! (consummated our marriage). You are sent away without an eternal relationship with God.
Rajun Cajun · 500 weeks ago
Isaiah tells us that God did not give Israel a divorce cert. and Paul tells us that the mystery of marriage represents Christ's love for His church, the result being, as your article communicates, "....divorce always violates the imagery God has designed for marriage."
Does the imagery that the Bible speaks of represent true Israel as a whole and the true Church as a whole or all individuals that are outwardly associated with each group? We know from the Biblical record and from current reality that not all Israel was Israel and not everyone in the church is the Church. What about those individuals within Israel and the Church that profess to be members, but are not truly members (as evident by their fruit). Were they ever "married" to God? Will God, on the last day, show Himself to be married to false Christians by granting them eternal life?
Relating this to marriage what if a spouse, even though they spoke a vow, proved themselves to not be committed to that vow by committing unrepentant adultery or abandoning their marriage? If the violated spouse chooses to divorce the guilty spouse would this be consistent with the imagery of God revealing who the true Church is and the false Church is. 1 Jn 2:19 says, "They went out from us, but they were not really of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they went out, so that it would be shown that they all are not of us."
Rob · 500 weeks ago
I sinned with drugs; Josh sinned with infidelity!! What sin have you commited or are you currently continue to sin with as you call yourself a Christian? Jesus's blood on the cross paid the price for us.
So it's up to us as Christians--when we sin, what do we do?? Do we as society does, make excuses, blame others or stand up and own your sin!!!!
Josh knows he did wrong, it's now up to him to repent and makes things right!!!
38 million or whatever it was on this site. That's crazy. That's more than the population of Canada. So if you find out your own pastor, family member or friend was in the site, how would you feel???
All we can do is pray for Josh, Anna and their family and at the same time pray for your marriage to stay strong, and right with the Lord.
Again, I am in no way defending him or making excuses for him, but I am saying let's not pile on an already broken man!!!!
Ken · 500 weeks ago
I will tackle your issues without publishing your comments because your accusations are false. It is irrational to equate incest to to inappropriate touching by a minor towards his sisters. It does not stand up to the definition of incest as no sexual activity occurred. I am not saying that what he did was minor, but it certainly was not major either when you look at exactly what was alleged, mainly touching a breast of 10-12 year olds. It would not surprise me if many of the men and women in your life did not do much worse with their siblings, the difference being it was consensual. Many psychologist wrongly believe it is a normal part of exploring ones sexuality to have some sexual type contact with a sibling, and they do not in any way consider this to be incest, because it is not. It is sinful, but no where near incest.
We as Christians understand that Josh should receive harsh punishment for his sins against Anna, no doubt. But be honest, aren't you and the liberals very glad that although you feel conservative Christians put up with too much sin and sinners at times, you much prefer the way of Jesus to the way of Mohammed. Is that what you are asking for Christians to do? When a fellow believer falls into grievous sin we are to begin stoning them. Look what you get with that in the ISIS world. America was built on forgiveness and starting over.
No, the ways of Christ and His Word appear foreign to you. You are so bent on insuring that Josh is punished that you are unwilling to wait patiently and see if God will redeem and restore Him. Or you are so bent on protecting Anna and the kids, that you are not wiling to allow God to do His mighty work. Either way, your fears are not the compass by which Christians are to live. We get our instructions from the Lord ad we trust His will to be done, whether that is punishment, or forgiveness, or both for Josh. But we let Anna and those close to her decide what is and is not God's specific will. All we can do is say what is His overall will, and that is that even in cases of adultery we keep our promises and our hopes alive, not in Josh, but in God and His Word... while at the same time believing with you that Josh cannot be let off "scott free" without proving his repentance to Anna.
It is weird to me how this same things happen in a the life of famous people everywhere and you and others would be the first to say let them do whatever they want. The emotionalism comes because Josh comes from a conservative Christian background, and you want to hold him to a higher standard than you might others. We too want a higher standard for him, but not at an emotional pitch that Anna must by all means leave him. I want Ben Affleck back in his marriage too. Marriages we believe should stay together, and if they cannot, so be it, but it is outside God's overall will for marriage.
The Anna Duggar story may end up like Elliott Spitzer's or it may end up like the beautiful God filled story of Kathy Lee Gifford. One was redeemed by the Words and saving grace of Jesus and the other tried to make it work only to discover for sure she was married to an unrepentant man. Only Anna can decide which story she wants told, and then only Josh can finish the story, one way or the other. In the mean time, we are on the Kathy Lee side of the story, and are asking Anna if she wants to see if the Lord wants that story to be played out in her life? No guarantees... just loving a man enough to allow him to make things right.
Ken · 500 weeks ago
Miriam · 500 weeks ago
I hope you are well.