Saturday, September 19, 2015

The ONLY Thing that Should Sever a Christian Marriage



{My name is Dennis Marks from Meridian, MS. I am jail chaplain at the Lauderdale County Detention Facility, affiliated with Good News Jail and Prison Ministry. I have been married to my *onliest* wife, Linda, for 31 years. We have seven children and six grandchildren with one on the way. Linda is a stay-at-home mom and we homeschool all our children. One of our favorite things is to get together every Friday night for “Family Night” for all who can come. Interesting fact: Two of our sons married sisters so all their children are double first cousins.}

What is going on in our American culture? Marriage has been “redefined” by the highest court in the land. Christians are being mocked as some have slid into deep, sinful passions and have brought disgrace to the Church and Christian families. When Josh Dugger said, “I am the biggest hypocrite!” there were probably many others who read that and were condemned by their own consciences. In case you haven’t noticed, marriage in America has been on the skids for quite some time. The LGBT…{add the rest of the letters if you care to} community is not the primary reason for the destruction of marriage in America. I believe the Christian Community has done a very good job of destroying the image of marriage for our world in very serious ways.

Kim Davis, county clerk in Kentucky, who is refusing to grant marriage licenses to “gay couples”, is herself on her fourth marriage. I really appreciate her determination to live by her convictions under a lot of pressure, but one disappointed couple quickly pointed out her disrespect for marriage by being on her fourth marriage. Kim was disturbed by that. She never really had control of the conversation after that. Thankfully, Mrs. Davis has indicated that she is sorry for her past, has repented and now desires to live according to the Word of God.

Many conservative politicians seem to have the rhetoric of preserving “traditional” marriage {one man/one woman} but taking a closer look, many have had multiple marriages themselves. How is that respecting traditional marriage? We deserve the ridicule from the heathen who say that we want only biblical marriage but we don’t respect what God has laid out for us in His Word.

You want to start a big argument on a Christian blog? Just start sharing what the Bible says about marriage and you will get some really bad feedback. You get comments: “the exception clause”, “God wouldn’t want us to be unhappy”, “We need to just forgive and move on”.

But God has a lot to say about marriage. It is THE institution that He references for showing His relationship with the Church {salvation}. The Church is the Bride of Christ and He is the Bridegroom. Christ is pictured as a husband loving his wife, paying the bridal price for her, going and preparing a place for her to live with Him in His house. Marriage reveals God’s great salvation plan. We vow to follow Christ and be faithful to Him whatever happens. We must not be found unfaithful before our spiritual consummation in Heaven or God will say, “I never knew you!” {Our relationship has not been fully consummated and you are sent away.}

So let me start the conversation. What is biblical marriage?

Ephesians 5:25-33
Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her to make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water through the word, and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. After all, no one ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cares for it, just as Christ does the church—for we are members of his body. "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh." This is a profound mystery— but I am talking about Christ and the church. However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.

Marriage cannot be divided without death. If one person physically dies, the one-flesh relationship is over. Breaking this sacred unity is like cutting yourself in half. “Two shall become one.” There is so much more in this passage.

For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. 3 So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress:but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. {Romans 7:2-3}

Paul makes it clear that death is the only severer to Christian marriage. If a person marries another after already being married to someone else, they are committing adultery unless the first spouse dies. {It is clear that this means physical death.}

For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven. {Matthew 22:30}

Marriage in this life ends with death possibly because we are then actually married to God in eternity.

The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause? And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife:and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away? He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives:but from the beginning it was not so. And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery:and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry. But he said unto them, all men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.
Matthew 19: 3-11

Notice that the Pharisees heard how strict Jesus’ teaching on marriage was to the extent that they wondered if it was even good to get married. Interesting to note is this peculiar “exception clause” that is only found in Matthew’s Gospel. The other two Gospels are almost exactly the same except for the obvious “except it be for fornication”. Matthew included this for a reason but not the one most people think. Matthew was primarily written for Christians coming from the Jewish culture. Jewish couples were “espoused”-something much more serious than even engagement. It was a covenant to complete the marriage process by the Marriage Supper and the consummation of the marriage vows. 

The marriage was only final AFTER the supper/consummation, not before. Remember the relationship of Joseph and Mary. If she had been found to have been unfaithful before the supper/consummation, Joseph could have provided her father with a divorce document and Mary would come to public shame. This is also a great picture of our salvation. We must be faithful to the end to participate in the Marriage Supper of the Lamb to finally consummate our relationship with Christ. If we are found unfaithful at the end, God will declare “I never knew you” {haven’t consummated our relationship because of unfaithfulness}.

Have we not all one Father? Has not one God created us? Why then are we faithless to one another, profaning the covenant of our fathers? Judah has been faithless, and abomination has been committed in Israel and in Jerusalem. For Judah has profaned the sanctuary of the Lord, which he loves, and has married the daughter of a foreign god. May the Lord cut off from the tents of Jacob any descendant of the man who does this, who brings an offering to the Lord of hosts! And this second thing you do. You cover the Lord's altar with tears, with weeping and groaning because he no longer regards the offering or accepts it with favor from your hand. But you say, "Why does he not?" Because the Lord was witness between you and the wife of your youth, to whom you have been faithless, though she is your companion and your wife by covenant. Did he not make them one, with a portion of the Spirit in their union? And what was the one God seeking? Godly offspring. So guard yourselves in your spirit, and let none of you be faithless to the wife of your youth. "For the man who does not love his wife but divorces her, says the Lord, the God of Israel, covers his garment with violence, says the Lord of hosts. So guard yourselves in your spirit, and do not be faithless."
Malachi 2:10-16

This passage deals with those who “profaned” their marriage vows. Malachi says they were “faithless to one another, profaning the covenant of our fathers”; very serious language. Malachi declares that they should be “cut off” by the Lord from being considered part of Jacob {God’s people}. What was there offense? They were divorcing their wives.

This is only a short article on Marriage by the Book but you can see that it is serious to God how we treat marriage. We cannot afford to take it lightly. Those cultures that have strayed from God’s design for marriage have paid a heavy price. 

Comments (25)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Loved this - thank you for sharing.
1 reply · active 496 weeks ago
Dennis Marks's avatar

Dennis Marks · 496 weeks ago

Appreciate the affirmation
I know it is not unlawful in God's eyes for a widow or widower to remarry. But I have seen many cases where this has also caused problems...mostly for the children who are then subjected to other siblings that comes forth from the second marriage. My husband and I have always promised one another that should anything ever happen to one of us, the other will not remarry. We both know all too well the difficulties and confusion that can stem from children having a step-parent and possible step-siblings. And a part of me always wondered which spouse the person would stand next to in the eternal world. Any thoughts on this topic?
3 replies · active 496 weeks ago
The decision to remarry after being widowed should be made based on whether or not it is good for the children involved. Now their welfare needs to take precedence, and it's my opinion that most often they are better served by having an uncle, grandfather (or aunt or grandmother) step into the role of the deceased parent rather than remarrying. Sometimes that's not the case -- we had a dear friend who passed away far too soon of a very aggressive cancer. He left behind a wife and six rather young children. They had been friends of another large family, and this young father (a doctor) had the wife as a patient (with the same cancer). She also passed away, about six months after he died, of the same form of cancer. About a year later, the widow and widower married and combined their families, and it worked out beautifully. But I would think that this would be the exception rather than the norm.
There is actually no biblical basis for marriage in Heaven. That is why Christian vows are "to death do us part". That is actually a more new age thing similar to the thought that people become angels watching over us. It is a comfort thing a lot of Christians like to say at funerals, but has no biblical ground.
Dennis Marks's avatar

Dennis Marks · 496 weeks ago

Great point...No marriage or giving in marriage in heaven.
rajuncajun's avatar

rajuncajun · 497 weeks ago

I would like to comment on the following three quotes from the article.

(1) We must not be found unfaithful before our spiritual consummation in Heaven or God will say, “I never knew you!” {Our relationship has not been fully consummated and you are sent away.}

This seems to hint to a possibility that one can lose their salvation. God's declaration of "I never knew you" to unbelievers at the judgment says that He NEVER knew them. Not that He once knew them and they became unfaithful. If God knows someone via saving faith then that individual is in fact KNOWN by God (even before the foundation of the world) and they are sealed for eternal life. They can not become unknown and be sent away.

(2) If a person marries another after already being married to someone else, they are committing adultery unless the first spouse dies.

We've discussed this in the past but the exception clause does allow for one to remarry and not commit adultery if they divorced due to an unfaithful spouse or abandonment. The reason for the exception clause given in this article is incorrect. The greek word is porneia and it includes a host of immoral sexual conduct including both fornication and adultery. Matthew had actual marriage in view not engagement. One says, why didn't Matthew use moicheia if he meant adultery. Well that doesn't mean that we should unnecessarily limit porneia in this context to exclude adultery. Porneia, especially in the context of this passage being about marriage, does in fact include adultery and other sexual sins of a married individual (i.e. incest, homosexuality, prostitution, beastiality, etc.)

(3) We must be faithful to the end to participate in the Marriage Supper of the Lamb to finally consummate our relationship with Christ. If we are found unfaithful at the end, God will declare “I never knew you” {haven’t consummated our relationship because of unfaithfulness}.

Same response as (1) above. The indwelling Holy Spirit seals true believers until the Marriage Supper of the Lamb. True believers can't be "betrothed" to Christ and not be part of the Marriage Supper because they were not unfaithful to the end. If they are declared unfaithful then they were never true believers.
4 replies · active 496 weeks ago
Hi Rajun Cajun,

From points 1& 3, I believe the idea is stated very clearly in in the words of Jesus, "I never knew you." One can look ike they are known of the Lord and unfortunately not be. If they have no fruit their salvation is suspect as a good branch bears much fruit. The wheat nad the tares go side by side until the end.

For point 2, Jesus is actually speaking against divorce and paints even these types of divorces as permitted by Moses because of the hardness of hearts. Jesus is not advocating this ... just repeating what it seems he is lamenting that a divorce clause was ever granted by Moses. He doesn't even say "God permitted" it... he says Moses permitted it.
Dennis Marks's avatar

Dennis Marks · 496 weeks ago

This is not the post to debate OSAS but if you are infatuated with John Calvin to any degree, you will respond as you do. If you will actually read the Bible without the Calvinist/OSAS blinders on, you will see what I posted is true. Life is test. We are on probation. "He who endures until the end shall be saved", not he who has a one-time moment of faith in Jesus. We must enter and continue in faith. "For without faith it is impossible to please God". OSAS is the oldest lie in the Bible--It is claimed you can sin and "you shall not surely die".
My point was that the so-called exception clause is based on a misconception of the text from Matthew, which actually goes along with the salvation message. We are espoused to God like Mary was espoused to Joseph before their marriage supper/consummation. Joseph could have in good faith given Mary a document of divorce if she was found to be unfaithful before their final vows were consummated (which she was not). Therefore there is no exception clause for those who have consummated their vows.
BTW--the sealing you mentioned is not as you may imagine. Sealing of a document was not an unbreakable seal. It was proof of authenticity. An unbroken seal meant that what was in the document was authentic and could be carried out. A broken seal meant that the document had been compromised in some way and became invalid and would not be carried out. We must remain faithful through the grace that saves (not by mere human effort) or our sealing becomes unsealed/compromised and is invalid.
AND "I never knew you" would make no sense if it meant anything other than not consummating our relationship with God. God *knows* everybody intellectually so He could not be saying He never met us. "Joseph knew her not until the birth of Jesus" shows the biblical meaning of *knowing* in that there was no marriage consummation until later.
I would love to lay out the fallacy of OSAS in another post but this post was to give information about what the Bible says about the permanence of marriage. If Christians would follow the Bible's teaching on this, we would see so many benefits in our world.
Dennis Marks's avatar

Dennis Marks · 496 weeks ago

This relates to the wise and foolish virgins. Both groups were virgins (ready for marriage) but one group was not prepared when the doors were opened then shut.
You cannot really understand 'betrothal" and only have a contemporary understanding of marriage. Please take the time to do the research. I am not asking you take my word on this. But do take The Word itself as your authority.
I read this morning:
"If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. But if he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, that every charge may be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector." (Brother=believer. Refuses to repent=being lost and considered and outsider not a believer)
Dennis Marks's avatar

Dennis Marks · 496 weeks ago

Matt 7
21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you:depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Seems clear that the ones who enter heaven must DO the will of the Father to the end. There is no rebuttal to what this individual stated was true--prophesied, cast out devils, wonderful works. Only believers can be instruments of prophesy, casting out devils and doing wonderful works but if they do not continue to follow Christ they will not be invited to the Marriage Supper of the Lamb to consummate the marriage and the Lord will say, "I never knew you". (We never finalized our relationship at the supper/consummation).
I certainly believe there are fake "believers" (not real believers). I don't think they are mentioned here. It is talking about those who continue in the faith to the end and those who do not. False security is not security at all.
Did you know young widows and widowers under are commanded to remarry?

"I advise these younger widows to marry again, have children, and take care of their own homes. Then the enemy will not be able to say anything against them." 1st Timothy 5:14
2 replies · active 496 weeks ago
This says "advise", not "commanded". Even if they have young children, they are at liberty to decide that their family would be better served by their remaining single.
Dennis Marks's avatar

Dennis Marks · 496 weeks ago

I think permission is being given to remarry if a widow. Older widows were cared for my their families and church. There are even parameters for what was "a widow indeed". It was probably a good thing in most cases for younger widows to remarry so that there was no financial burden on family and church. The story of Ruth is a great example of God providing for widows in at least a couple of ways. Directly to Ruth through Boaz and Naomi through Ruth. I would council widows to take a lot of time to pray and seek God before remarrying. I have heard some sad stories of hasty remarriages.
Depends on what translation you use. That was NLT.

KJV : "I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully."

Aramaic: "I am willing therefore that the younger ones marry, bear children, lead their households and do not give any occasion of contempt to the enemies"

NAS: "So I want younger widows to marry, have children, manage their homes, and not give the enemy any chance to ridicule them."
2 replies · active 496 weeks ago
Interesting...I'm wondering now if this is interpreted that they should re-marry if they do not already have children, being that they should be given the chance to procreate. Hence the term "younger widows".
Dennis Marks's avatar

Dennis Marks · 496 weeks ago

Interesting reflections. Romans 7 makes it clear that when a spouse dies, the living spouse is released from their vows (till death do us part) to be able to marry again. There doesn't seem to be restrictions on this. Younger widows could have more opportunities to have children (Godly seed).
Lady Virtue's avatar

Lady Virtue · 497 weeks ago

Thank you for posting the Biblical truth about this issue. It is rarely told. Sadly, many ministers are too afraid to preach it or teach it, fearing the response of men more than pleasing God.
1 reply · active 496 weeks ago
Dennis Marks's avatar

Dennis Marks · 496 weeks ago

Thanks for you kind reflections.
It is refreshing to see a blog post acknowledging just what the Bible teaches - death alone frees one to re-marry!
1 reply · active 496 weeks ago
Dennis Marks's avatar

Dennis Marks · 496 weeks ago

Amen
Dennis Marks's avatar

Dennis Marks · 496 weeks ago

I need to say a special thank you to Lori for letting me post on her blog. It was very gracious for her to do so. I am not a marriage expert. I hope I reflect the name of the blog--Always Learning. The humility of the posts on this blog are very refreshing. May the Lord bless the ministry being done here. I just want to learn from Jesus Christ more and more each day and follow Him in humble obedience. If you would like to connect with me you can go to my ministry website: http://local.goodnewsjail.org/lauderdale/
2 replies · active 496 weeks ago
Have read through the total, including your responses to posts, Dennis, and must say I am proud of the way you have presented God's truth in an understandable fashion. May I have permission to print this and share as the Lord leads? I already know several who would read it, and possibly be helped.
Yes, print it, Ruth!
Dennis Marks's avatar

Dennis Marks · 496 weeks ago

I would give anyone permission to use it in its entirety without editing it. Thanks again for letting me share with you.

Post a new comment

Comments by