Focus on the Family had a married couple on the radio
recently who has written books on marriage. The topic they were discussing on
this program was conflict between spouses. Their solution was to keep talking
about it and praying about it until you reach a point where both spouses are
happy with the resolution.
Jim Daly asked about a conflict that just
didn't seem to be resolving, then what? Their solution was to keep praying
about it until the one with the better solution won the conflict. Huh??? Not one
mention about the husband being the leader or the wife being submissive. Not
one! I think Jim Daly was trying to hint at that but I can't be sure. They seem
to think that the one with the better solution should win whether that is the
husband or the wife.
I am not sure how that works since both
parties always think they have the better solution. This is why conflicts can
go on and on when there isn't one designated leader. I think a much better way
to solve a conflict would be to both share your concerns and solutions and then
the husband decides the solution since he is the head of the home and the wife
is to obey him in everything. In doing it this way, there is no conflict!
This proves my point that there must be a
leader in every organization including the family.
If not, there is going to be strife and probably a lot of it. The Bible
repeatedly commands us to pursue peace with all men and not be in strife or
quarrels with others.
You and you alone can control your
reaction, your anger, your emotions, and your moods towards your husband. You
have no control whatsoever over your husband and his opinions, habits, or
leadership. Instead of having a long drawn out conflict as this couple espouses
over many days or even weeks sometimes, let your husband lead and have the last
word and final say.
Depart
from evil, and do good;
seek
peace, and pursue it.
Psalm 34:14
FREEINDEED! · 483 weeks ago
Thanks again for Truth in the madness :)
Lori Alexander 122p · 483 weeks ago
FREEINDEED! · 483 weeks ago
I appreciate your prayers for them. I have many marriages failing around me. It can be quite disheartening BUT Romans 5:1-5! I am hearing SO MANY who are just choosing not to suffer through with their spouse. But it is a vain pursuit. There is suffering in this life.
I LOVED Anna Duggar's response. Desiring His wisdom and not relying on our own understanding- Revolutionary! Have a blessed day, Lori.
Gracie · 483 weeks ago
FREEINDEED! · 483 weeks ago
upwithmarriage 25p · 483 weeks ago
Lori Alexander 122p · 483 weeks ago
upwithmarriage 25p · 483 weeks ago
Katie · 483 weeks ago
Lori Alexander 122p · 483 weeks ago
Deb · 483 weeks ago
Lori Alexander 122p · 483 weeks ago
Anon M · 483 weeks ago
I stopped taking advice from focus on the family after James Dobson left. They wanted to change the ministries viewpoint on child training to suit the modern era and Dr Dobson wouldn't have a bar of it. And so he agreed to step away. They have also come under fire for a booklet they produced instructing women on how to 'properly' take the abortion pill. Instead of giving them other prolife options and hope in Jesus. They tell them if they are going to have an abortion, do it the right way. So sad. (And yes, I can produce links on the booklet to support my claims.)
Lori Alexander 122p · 483 weeks ago
Anon M · 483 weeks ago
Dan · 483 weeks ago
Anon M · 483 weeks ago
Ken · 483 weeks ago
As a business transitions and management consultant, in my field we have moved almost completely away from equal partnerships to fractional partnerships where one partner owns a larger share so that he is the final decision maker. Or we are findings lot of transitions being done where the young Buyer stays as an associate for 2-3 years then buys 100% of the business with the previous owner moving to the associate position. Especially in partnerships where on partner is older heading to retirement and the other younger, one can see that conflicting goals can quickly enter the relationship.
Your question is a good one, but the facts go on to prove Lori's point. That even in business it is most often best for the business to have one person have the final say. And as such, this lead partner often defers to his fractional partner(s), but in major disagreements he retains the right to lead the business forward where he feels is best. This decision as to what to do, or where to go is far less damaging to the business than a regular conflict between two partners that can destroy the business moral and ultimately the business itself if not resolved. It is ugly for the employees when two partners are in regular conflict.
Jamie · 482 weeks ago