Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Allowing Children Pain


Since I didn't give my children drugs when they had a fever, I was a bad mother.  Since I gave my children a few whacks on the bottom when they disobeyed me, I was a bad mother.  I get it.  Some people think that children should never experience pain.  The Bible teaches differently ~

If you endure chastening, God deals with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chastens not?  But if you be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are you bastards, and not sons. 

Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence : shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. 

Now no chastening for the present seems to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yields the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby . 
Hebrews 12:7-11

I allowed my children to suffer at times, because I loved them.  Yes, if they broke their arm and were in extreme pain, I would give them Tylenol.  If they had a fever, however,  I would try to make them as comfortable as possible without trying to bring their fever down, because I knew that the fever is a good thing that kills the sickness in their bodies. {If the fever had ever become dangerously high, I would have given them Tylenol and taken them to the doctor.  I am not stupid.}

I often wonder if drugs are such a problem in today's society, because parents gave their children drugs for every little thing when they were growing up.  When they grew up they reasoned, "I am in pain.  This is a bad thing. I must take away the pain so I must take drugs."

I smacked them on the bottom a few times when they disobeyed me so they would obey me.  It worked!  When a baby bit me when nursing, I flicked their cheek once.  They never bit me again.  It worked!  Pain is a great teacher.

Many people believe pain and suffering are bad things.  They are not.  They are teachers that can teach us good things, like obeying authority and allowing our bodies to heal themselves naturally without the side effects of drugs.

God uses pain in our lives to teach us many things  ~ to trust in Him, to be more compassionate, to obey Him, to lean on Him and realize that this isn't our home.  It helps us to lessen our grip on things of this world.

In conclusion, I was not a bad mother.  I chose to mother the way that I did because my common sense and the wisdom I sought from the Lord told me to mother that way.  Sure, I made mistakes.  We all do, but I wanted my children to grow up as disciplined adults who could handle pain and know that it is part of life.

P.S.  Yes, that is a picture of my children when they were small!  So if you have small children, enjoy them.  They grow up quickly.

Comments (47)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
My children were not sick very often, but when they were I never let them suffer. I most certainly gave them Panadol for fevers as I would myself. I don't believe of unnecessary suffering (for children or adults alike) when we have the medicines to help and ease the discomfort. If my children had a headache (once again, it wasn’t often) I would given them the appropriate amount of Panadol.

Illness isn’t the time to teach children to “understand” pain for later in life (“grow up as disciplined adults who could handle pain and know that it is part of life”), it was a time for me as a mother to do what I believe was right, ease their suffering if I can. Yes, we all suffer pain, some more than others, we really don’t need any more than necessary. Giving my sons Panadol hasn’t turned them into weak adults, quite the opposite. They know how to manage pain and what is the appropriate course of action for things like fevers.

I almost died from a fever a child as a result of German Measles – thank goodness my parents acted when they did, as it might have been too late.
Lori, You are 100% correct in everything you said. Thank you for never backing down from speaking the Truth.
I agree with the medicine thing, 100%. I love your blog but I have to say that I disagree with the hitting thing....especially hurting a baby. Didn't Jesus teach us by example to love the little children? I certainly can't imagine Jesus hitting or hurting a child, just to teach them a lesson. I believe in discipline, but not in physically hurting a child of God.

Here is another Christian viewpoint on spanking, in case you or anyone else is interested...
http://www.memoriesoncloverlane.com/search/label/...
1 reply · active 686 weeks ago
I have a feeling the comments are going to turn into a big debate on spanking. #annoyingrehash
1 reply · active 686 weeks ago
Now you have the answer to the country's drug problems? Come on. A complex problem like that. . .and "no Tylenol" is the answer? That is absurd. Study the problem, read the research, talk to recovering addicts (or at least meet one!). . . .and then blog about the solution.
1 reply · active 686 weeks ago
". . . because I knew that the fever is a good thing that kills the sickness in their bodies. {If the fever had ever become dangerously high, I would have given them Tylenol and taken them to the doctor. I am not stupid.}"

I thought the fever was good thing, that killed the sickness. Suddenly it isn't anymore? Sounds like you were just playing around.
2 replies · active 686 weeks ago
Some cannot understand how “making a child feel as comfortable as possible” can be done without drugs. We used drugs sparingly in the family, but when we could not make our child comfortable with natural means we gave them drugs in low doses. Most headaches could be solved with massage and most stomach aches with natural remedies. Tylenol often causes stomach problems, even though it is milder then aspirin, so you trade one pain for another.

No one likes pain, but fevers, so long as they remain under 103 in children, are natures natural way of fighting the virus or bug. Stop it too early and you hold onto the bug much longer. So let nature take its course and quit babying your kids, for their sake. We never withheld Tylenol from the kids so that they would have pain, but in each instance we did what we felt was best for the child. And they all turned out just fine. A few runs to the doctors, a very modest use of Tylenol, lots of ice and heat, and our kids turned out just fine.

I refer those of you who run to the medicine cabinets for fevers to the following article that says that parents are twice as likely to give drugs to their kids for fevers under 100.4 than doctors would recommend, precisely because a fever is beneficial to a child. It goes on to say how to make your child comfortable, and finishes by saying seek a doctor’s help for fevers over 103-104. http://www.truestarhealth.com/members/cm_archives...
I like what you said. Give a teething baby some Baby Tylenol or a frozen washcloth first? I use the washcloth method. Skin their knee? Clean it, neosporen, bandaid, and they are off running. Need antibiotics? If that's what will cure them, great. If it's just a seasonal cold, they will live.
I personally was the "sick kid" in the family with constant (bad) allergies and tonsillitis. My parents knew I was in real pain with the tonsillitis, so they gave me the needed antibiotics and fever reducers when I truly had "high fevers", had my tonsils taken out, and that was that. My brothers didn't have allergy problems like I did, and aside from the random ER trip, they weren't given "stuff" just because of a stuffy nose or scratchy throat (any one else gargle with warm salt water?)

As I've gotten older and my allergies worsened, I turned to allergy shots instead of pumping myself full of allergy medicines that semi-mask the problem, not (eventually) remove it. Is that because my parents didn't give me reign of the medicine cabinet? God no. It's because I know what's currently best for my body. Just like you as a parent know what's best for your child's.
I agree with you! I give my children drugs, but only when they need it. I read your post a long time ago on the ear infection remedy. My son had 3 prior ear infections. When he got another one I went to the doctor to confirm it and I got the script but didn't fill it. We tried you're method and it worked! He got over it and hasn't gotten one since.

My 21 month old and 23 month old (we adopted one) get 12-14 hours of sleep a night and take a 2 hour nap. We've always been strict on sleeping, limiting how much sugar they get and limiting their exposure to drugs/antibiotics. Besides the ear infections my son is almost 2 and has never been sick. Yes, he has been exposed to a lot.
My daugther was in a safe home for 6 months prior to us getting her, but they did not give her a healthy diet and did not enforce good sleeping habits. I was in touch with them during this time and she was sick 4 time while living with them and got 4 different doses of antibiotics. She has been living with us for 7 months and have never gotten sick.

Kids get sick, I know that, but as parents there is a lot we can do to help their immune systems be as strong as possible.

I don't know if this has made a difference, but we also do not vaccinate our children for several reasons.
http://momanswerswithbrit.com/?p=725
SAH Farmer Mom's avatar

SAH Farmer Mom · 686 weeks ago

I once was in the doctor's office when a mom demanded that the doctor give her a prescription for antibiotics for her child because he had a cold. Antibiotics are not going to help with a cold but she was convinced that something needed to be done to "fix" her child. The overuse of antibiotics is the main cause of drug resistant "bugs". I didn't give my kids meds everytime they had an ache or a pain. We used warm baths, heating pads, hot tea and honey, etc and I have extremely healthy, happy kids (Thank the Lord). We have had to use antibiotics (rarely) but their use is strictly when it is absolutely needed. I can't help but wonder why some of the "repeat" commentors keep reading your blog when they obviously just want to start an arguement. If you don't like what is said, click the tab that says "Next Blog".
1 reply · active 686 weeks ago
Sheesh. I'm not sure why your post is so controversial. What you wrote seems perfectly reasonable to me. It reminded me of the book The Gift of Pain by Paul Brand and Phillip Yancey.
1 reply · active 686 weeks ago
Mrs Alexander is completely right about fevers. Low grade fevers serve as a natural biological response to fighting viruses. Children who are allowed to fight low grade fevers with natural means-ie: boosting immune responses with natural remedies, cool baths, cool drinks, and a lot of TLC, better strengthen their immunities to viruses and bacteria. High fevers that do not respond to natural remedies, often signal an infection and require further care, and will benefit from analgesics to reduce the temperature to prevent any problems.

Flicking a nursing baby on the cheek is hardly causing undue pain. If one values the nursing relationship, and wishes for it to continue, it is the first line of defense in teaching a nursling that continued biting equals a physiological response from mother. Otherwise, baby begins to see that he/she can bite, chew and otherwise harm mother in an extremely painful way.

Christians today that dismiss biblical instruction for discipline are generally the same people that disregard any parts of the Word that are not easy, comfortable and that cause conviction. They only follow their own version of the gospel..one that's easy for them to swallow. They accuse those with strong biblical discipline of being abusive..yet we are the parents of many children who are blessing others with growing children into adults who are raised with love and selflessness towards others. We are not the parents in the store screaming, or conversely, allowing our children to ruin the day for every person they come in contact with, by living out the errant teaching of modern parenting: children are little demi-gods never to be made to feel wrong about their behavior.

So often, parents who oppose any type of strong biblical parenting choose to say that it is not "natural". However, they haven't spent much time examining God's creation. All higher animal forms strike their young when they are out of line-presumably causing far more pain than a strong "no" and a hand swat. Have you seen the teeth on tigers?

The other things neglected by those who love to attack parents who discipline, is the fact that parents who follow the biblical model of parenting, rarely spank their children. It is a form of considered discipline, and if parenting is done lovingly and correctly, rarely used, and almost definitely completed by school age. From there, parents can trust their children to obey both them, and the societal requirements for behavior. All the while, the permissive parents who are scared to parent, have children screaming and hollering and whining and disobeying..effectively running the lives of the parents. These are the parents of only one or two children who talk about being "so stressed..so tired...I could never have any more children...oh the terrible two's..oh the terrible teen years"..etc. It isn't coming from parents who love and discipline according to God's Word!

You reap what you sow. Adult children who are thankful for being raised in a biblically discipled home..and not simply in convenient ways. They themselves then grow to be adults who love and serve the Lord and their fellow man. The ones who grow without discipline grow to whine about their childhood..whine about their lack of entitlements..and visit Christian blogs with the sole purpose of causing strife.

God Bless Mrs Alexander. You keep up speaking the truth.
2 replies · active 686 weeks ago
Ronda Ellis's avatar

Ronda Ellis · 686 weeks ago

Hi Lori,
What can I say except I love Always Learning--I grew up with only a Mom and I miss her terribly today! What I am about to say is in no way to harm her memory, but for the adults that have spoken against spanking...my Mama loved me, but not enough to discipline me properly; my parents split up when I was only 5 because my Daddy wanted to discipline and Mama didn't!? I grew into a selfish, self-centered young woman and have thankfully come to know the Lord and He has given grace to overcome so many obstacles that I believe would not have been there had there been proper discipline--As to allowing children to deal with physical pain and not running to the medicine cabinet or the doctor always I agree--I had quite a few physical issues as a child and as a result of constant treatment for things that truly may have required it, I now have an allergy alert list that reads like a small novel...I also deal with physical issues now that have a tremendous amount of pain and although God is gracious, had I learned at an early age to deal with more pain perhaps life would be easier now! Thank you again for the gracious kindness with which you share!
1 reply · active 686 weeks ago
" When a baby bit me when nursing, I flicked their cheek once. They never bit me again. It worked! Pain is a great teacher."
I strongly disagree with the above quote.
Aiding a child's immune system when he has a fever instead of fighting his God given immune system with tylenol is knowledgeable parenting. Causing a baby physical pain as they are nestled safely in mother's arms is sickening.
I have had the joy to nurse eight babies. Four babies were adotped and four by birth. All of them as they explored their world tried to bite. Properly latching a baby on a PAYING ATTENTION to baby will prevent the little "bite" from hurting A baby's mouth that is fully latched on can not bite. If baby bites it's a clue to momma to pay attention to baby. It's just as easy to use a pinky and remove him from the breat than it is to "flick" him. If we will flick our babies when they bite what else will we pinch, hit or flick our little babies over.
God designed the nursing relationship between mother and suckling to be a place of learning to trust, •Psalm 22:9 declares, “You (God) brought me out of the womb, you made me trust in you even at my mother’s breast.”
2 replies · active 686 weeks ago
You "respectfully contend" to use the words, "ignorant and a misuse of Scripture"? Then, you go on to say the "very discipline God has called us countless times to use"? Verse please? Where are we told to hit, or flick, or pinch newborn or young babies?____I never used the word, "abuse" you did. ____"Fit's your agenda" And...what agenda would that be? The one that says a baby can not bite painfully when properly latched? The one that encourages mother's to watch the baby instead of being on fb or blogging or engrossed with converstaion because a baby will give a physcial clue before he bites? ____The Bible tells us that the breast is where a baby learns trust. How is that "misuse" of Scripture, dear?____Thank you for asking the Lord's blessing, he is and has blessed our family, and we are very grateful. Yes, nursing eight babies and working with countless other ladies helping with women's health issues and nursing has been a tremendous blessing. ____May you learn to have speech seasoned with Grace. Your children will be listening. ____
I am not an ignorant, busy, selfish first time mother, but thank you for your admonishment and breastfeeding education. Your use of "dear" is very condescending and I would appreciate the respectful discourse that any "gentle parent" would demand. I am expecting our 7th baby, all of which have been breastfed. I understand proper latching and infant cues. I also understand breastfeeding beyond infancy, and latch has little to do with biting at that point. Biting for the ages of 1+ is a sign of aggression, and one most children attempt to explore. I have also had my 2.5 year old son bitten to the point of bleeding, and the mother of the biter excused it because "she used to do that at the breast and now does bites her and hits her during a fit and she can't get her to stop". You do not know me or my speech from my disagreement with your characterization of the post.

My comment was in light of the post here. When a women with raised children who are apparently wonderful children of the Lord, posts that flicking a breast biting child is appropriate, and then a comment says something about "what else will you do to the child"; that infers abuse, it deserves a response from someone with the same belief. The "gentle parenting" crowd loves to characterize all Christians who use biblical discipline as abusers. I am all for parental autonomy. Raise your child(ren) as you see fit, but please reserve the "abuse" characterizations for people who are raising their children according to Scripture.

There are plenty of verses about raising our children with biblical chastisement, as well as how God chastises His children Himself. I will not cite all the verses here, as your agenda is clear.

I am not on FB, and never have been so don't worry about that being my reason for choosing to parent my children. I also do not text, or use a cell phone, or spend hours on the internet per day. I have responded to this post, because it matters to me-the defense of biblical parenting and the fact that gentle parenting advocates paint all parents who choose biblical parents as abusers. My speech is seasoned with grace, as I have six children I round the clock parent with a homeschooling home centered in Christ, but I don't expect you to look past your erroneous conclusion that I, or those like the Mrs Alexander, am a child abusers (your own leap you took from flicking to what else will you do to a baby?) because we raise our children in a manner according to our biblical conviction.

I won't comment anymore on this subject here, as I am about tired out from gentle parents attacking those with strong love and discipline for their children, with their "more enlightened modern and far more holy views", that bear out with children who are completely lacking in respect for authority. It differs none from the secular and moral relativism based views of parenting. Ever since the great exodus from biblical parenting, in favor of "newer and better" methods, we have had generations of children turning into adults who are out of control, and have no respect for their parents.

God bless you and your children much!
Lori - I haven't been able to stop thinking about this post. I just can't understand that a loving God would want us to hurt our children. God doesn't inflict pain on US - our decisions have natural consequences which cause us pain. ALLOWING pain and CAUSING pain are two different things. I would love to hear your rebuttal to this....

Two scriptures that come to mind:

Matthew 18:6....."But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

Matthew 25:40...."And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me."
8 replies · active 686 weeks ago
When a baby bit me when nursing, I flicked their cheek once.

My contention is the word, "baby". It does not say a 2 1/2 year old child or a 10 year old child or whatever other words, "Right Thinker" wants to insert for Lori or others who comment here.

Since there has been such arrogance I will add, in my own experience, I have seen families who think they have all the answers lose their children because they were so proud and rude and that is such a turn off. I have also seen parents who have failed on many important aspects of parenting but who were so filled with a genuine love that their children rise up and call their parents blessed.

Rightthinker speaks of a 1 year old showing agression. Why would a little child who has been tenderly cared for show aggression? Just as Right thinker keeps putter words into the mouths of others I think we can put false motives on our babies.By the way, so far, I have never had a child bite another one. Our children do understand and desire obedience. As far as our babies, we are teaching them trust before obedience.

I want to love mercy and walk humbly. Mercy does triumph over judgement.
I am curious about something. You mothers who are so opposed to my flicking my baby on the cheek ONCE to stop them from biting me, do you vaccinate your babies? A doctor puts needles into them causing them pain which you feel is for their best. Babies as young as 2 months old. Is that bad? It is definitely pain. They scream usually. One flick on the check to stop causing damage to a mother, is definitely best for the mother and teaches the baby to stop doing something that is harmful. Pain is very good sometimes, even when they are little, whether a flick on the cheek or a needle for medicine they may need. I see no difference.
4 replies · active 686 weeks ago
Danielle,
Actually, the comparison is very relevant. When we vaccinate children, we are causing them pain so that they will not have to endure it later through sickness. When we flick or spank, we are causing them pain (although very little) so that they will learn to be obedient. Both things inflict pain, but for the greater good of the child.
I agree.
Way to be a "bad mother"! :)

Post a new comment

Comments by